Exposed: The Unanimous Declaration Of The Thirteen United States Of SAmerica: July 4, 1776 Sussex Doc.

The truth exposed ! The Unanimous Declaration Of The Thirteen United States Of  America: July 4, 1776, Sussex Document, is a major find, and will become a political blunder against the British Empire, and the news media here in America.

A second video is about to go on line, we have the evidence to prove all the way to the Washington Post, and CNN News,they did not share the whole truth plus many many other news networks, they may have not investagated the documents, and just shared what the elite want, but seeing how we are not governed by the elite, and we are still going over the document, more information to challenge the Social Networking News Media is at work, further proving they lied or just failed to investigate.

And we do stand by the statement that the media did not want to share the information that British Royalty, of the Bill Clinton family was involved in the document, back around the very same time period. it would cause a international scandal. They should of just destroyed the document instead of trying to dis-credit the Sussex: Document as  just a copy.

It should also be noted, this document is the building of a People’s Government of The Republic. Placing We the People In Authority of the States as well as the Federal Government. Its the Wolds Largest Complaint Against England.

Sussex: Declaration of Independence The Truth– YouTube

Sussex: Declaration of Independence Of The United States of America, a hidden 200 years secret, pages 15 on the document, shows 2 names,
Robert R. Livingston and George Clinton Of The British Empire in 1784 London England, updated to the family of Bill Clinton, noted also was George Clinton (vice president) (1739–1812) time area or time line of this event. The follow documents will show that the Clinton family did have involvement in this document.
the full doc is displayed: http://teapartyorg.ning.com/forum/top…

If you are going to share such a document, and play the American people as idiots, by not sharing the whole truth because if all the scandals against Bill and Hillary Clinton, then shame on you, because now there is one more scandal and its 200 years old.
Of course this is a conspiracy theory, there is no way that the British Family of the Clinton’s and the Crown would do such a thing, hide such a document.

Sussex: Declaration of Independence Of The United States of America: http://teapartyorg.ning.com/forum/top…
Shame on us conspiracy theories ..right…?

 

• License

  • Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)

Sussex: Declaration of Independence The Truth Part 2– YouTube

 

 

After placing the document under a 50 to 100% magnification,  we find names, not shared, so us little Tea Party Patriots will.

First a copy and past of a writing connected to the title header of the document, now we could of got the name wrong, we do acknowledge this. Also below is a text, for, “The Unanimous Declaration Of The Thirteen United States Of  America: July 4, 1776 “, and I find it funny, this text, because they stated this document was hidden away for all most 200 years…..????

Snapshots of the document show a date of July 4, 1776, for this The Sussex: Declaration of Independence Of the United States of America

  Titled as-           TR Cengiefs

The Declaration Of The Thirteen States Of America

 TR Cengiefs , which meaning- Cengiefs is willing to hope that the patriotiftri and goad fenfe of your ftate will be influenced \sy motives fo important, and they re- queft, fir, that you will be pleafed

Journals of Congress : Containing the proceedings from Sept. 5, 1774 to [3d day of November 1788] …”

  On the left above photo, is July 4th

On the right hand side of photo above is 1776

The image above in our view and according to  them the document was nailed to a wall and we agree, but the whole in the middle here tell us that the document was stabbed with a dagger.

this name looks like Benj. Franklin., this was not listed in the names, there listed name are below, found on page 21: http://teapartyorg.ning.com/forum/topics/sussex-declaration-of-inde…

next names found below are…..Th ? Jefferson

next name below is Fra or Fia Littlefoot Lee, a tribal name ?

  next John Hancock, Richard Adams and others

here is a small  collection of names.

Working on the text, I think, this is close but I am not sure… there is something strange about this document,

Titled as-           TR Cengiefs

The Declaration Of The Thirteen States Of America July 4, 1776, for this The Sussex:

                                                         VS.

IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America

hen in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.

http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/

 

NATO & NAFTA Agenda, North Atlantic Treaty Organization

North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The 1945 UNITED STATES-UNITED KINGDOM INCOME TAX CONVENTION 1945, IRS London England.

It is not by chance, that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) 1945, and the building of North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) 1945 begun in the same time frame, the Convention was only printed in a  few news papers, and 1 or 2 Congressional Records displayed. Just like Obamacare, they made the documents so long, people gave up on reading it, and trusted in political parties, to represent them. All of this was tied into Anonymous Hits Federal Reserve in Hack Attack: Dump File Exposed NA…, no personal information was shared other then every Central World Banker in the World Banking Scam dubbed EU , and money transfers between companies, and their investment goals within the Federal Reserve. Its really a fantastic political agenda, gosh, just think, I could be rich by now…Na !!! not my style.

UNITED STATES-UNITED KINGDOM INCOME TAX CONVENTION 1945, IRS London England.

All the following documents are found & released in public domain, as a educational period, of American History at its best.

I am not going to post 1600 or so NAFTA docs, please…I would be old and tired by then, only 20 for now, then federal reserve banking document, that were released as public domain cc share alike educational records, that were forced into exposure by the freedom of information act. The some nasty little NATO document.

NATO

North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) to NAFTA,:

 What is NATO and NAFTA? NATO – National Atlantic Treaty Organization This is an alliance of countries.

In Mexico NAFTA has what?

In Mexico, NAFTA has created more industry and services jobs, at the expense of rural laborers, who cannot compete against the highly-subsidized Canadian and American farmers.… (MORE)

What is the NAFTA agreement?

It is the North American Free Trade Agreement. Canada, Mexico and the United States all signed an agreement creating a trade bloc. It eliminates tariffs on a number of imports… (MORE)

 NATO is the foundation of the UK, UN, EU, TPP Legislation, a agenda if you wish to understand

its goals ?

CFR Backgrounders

 

Introduction

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization, a cornerstone of transatlantic security during the Cold War, has significantly recast its role in the past twenty years. Founded in 1949 as a bulwark against Soviet aggression, NATO has evolved to confront threats ranging from piracy off the Horn of Africa to maritime security in the Mediterranean. But Russian actions in recent years, particularly its 2014 intervention in Ukraine, have refocused the alliance’s attention on the continent. Recent developments have also exposed unresolved tensions over NATO’s expansion into the former Soviet sphere.

http://www.cfr.org/nato/north-atlantic-treaty-organization-nato/p28287

Demetri Kantarelis dkantar@assumption.edu, an Associate Professor of Economics, Department of Economics and Global Studies at Assumption College, completed the research for this paper during the 1997-98 academic year while the author was visiting the Department of Future Conflict Studies at the Air War College/Air University, Maxwell Air Force Base, Montgomery, Alabama.

 

I. Introduction

There was a great deal of debate on whether or not the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) should continue existing after the 1991 breakup of the Soviet Union and the earlier dissolution of the Warsaw Pact. From 1991 to 1995, the NATO Alliance was perceived by some as missionless and less able to influence events as it became leaner and weaker.

After 1991 the immediate NATO responses to the changed circumstances it faced were: (1) a reduction in the number of commands from three to two, (2) the replacement of large standing forces by multinational rapid reaction forces, and (3) a reduction in the headquarters staff by more than one third, resulting in a staff composition with greater European presence and less U.S. personnel than before. But NATO’s destiny was to be rewritten. By itself alone, the Bosnia crisis proved wrong those who declared the Alliance missionless. The Dayton Accords and NATO’s effective involvement in the Bosnia conflict helped remind us of the true mission of the Alliance, a mission that was there all along. As the 1997 NDU/INSS Strategic Assessment states:

“The 1949 Washington Treaty establishing NATO signifies common principles of democracy, liberty, and the rule of law. Neither the ideological threat of communism nor the Soviet Union are mentioned. The concept of Europe is not defined in the Treaty as West or East. NATO’s success during its first forty years should be judged as much on what it helped create – a prosperous West Europe, whole and free – as what it stopped: an expansionist and hostile ideology. Whatever steps NATO now takes throughout the rest of Europe to promote wider peace and security are in consonance with the original Treaty.” ^[1]

Although the above quotation reminds us what NATO’s real mission is, the end of the cold war brought with it many new and more difficult challenges. These challenges are potentially less lethal, but  are still very dangerous and extremely complex. Logically, the Alliance has to adapt and evolve and, as it does so, remain focused on its mission. We have to keep studying its dynamic threat environments and how we can best prepare to deal with them.

Discussed in the remainder of this paper are NATO’s  mission (Section II); threats to it (Section III); some principles of alliance theory that may be useful in guiding NATO in its new path of dynamic evolution (Section IV); and a conclusion (Section V).

II. NATO’s Mission

NATO’s mission, as one may redefine it today, is to protect the interdependent economies of West/Central Europe and North America from internal, peripheral, and external peace-disturbing crises. Undoubtedly, this is a mission in consonance with the original 1948 treaty.

It is not difficult to see the similarities between “1949” and “1998”. Just askyourself: what were and still are NATO’s enemies then and now? Here is Lord Ismay’s 1948 quip that may be helpful: “… keep the Germans down, the Russians out, and the Americans in…”. At that time keeping the “Germans down” meant keeping “fascism down”; “Russians out” meant “communism out”; and “Americans in” meant “freedom, democracy, prosperity, and stability in”.

As the leader of the West, during this century the U.S. successfully fought wars against fascism and communism, proving that such anachronistic systems cannot sustain themselves and that they are not conducive to peace and prosperity. It was indeed a defining and fruitful victory, a victory that has been welcomed by Germans, Japanese, Central Europeans, Asians and many more. For more than fifty years now, ex-Axis countries have been demonstrating that they understand the values of peace, democracy, stability, and prosperity. Similarly, since 1991, “majority” Russia appears determined to try the best approach, the approach based on the rules of democracy and free markets.

But there is also “minority” Russia which asks: “Why NATO? Why NATO enlargement? What for?” Unfortunately, some Russians claim that the West has difficulty learning from recent history, and as a result history will repeat itself. NATO’s existence and, even more gravely, NATO’s enlargement, they say, is evidence that the West is preparing another invasion against mother Russia, exactly as the West did in recent past under German or French alliances. Needless to say, those few Russians ought not be afraid. They, like the rest of the world today, should see instability, extreme nationalism, and the potential resurgence of anachronistic systems as the enemy common to all, and, given recent history, especially to Europeans and Russians. An evolving NATO should not be feared by Russia or any other country. It and they face the same threats.

Flow Chart 1 (above) points out that the evolution paths of NATO, Russia, Central, and East Europe meet today in the area of a common mission. Undoubtedly, as NATO has been demonstrating for fifty years, its intention is to serve as a preventive medicine against potential instability which is undesired, not only by member states, but also by peripheral as well as external neighbors.

NATO serves as a quasi-public good for its members and as a pure public good for its non-members. It is non-exclusive in the protection it provides regardless of how much each member contributes. Simultaneously, it enables its peripheral and external neighbors (e.g. Switzerland, Austria, Sweden and even France) to free ride under its protective umbrella. With such protection, extremists or anachronisms in either member or non-member nations have less potential support for a rise to power. The obvious example is the non-member nations of Bosnia and its immediate land neighbors in conjunction with recent/current events there: NATO’s successful intervention not only restored order in the area, but it also prevented the outbreak of potential instability to its members, Russia’s “near abroad,” and possibly the entire world. The evidence clearly demonstrates that the evolving NATO should not be feared by Russia or any other nation. Instead, it should be embraced, welcomed and, if possible, assisted in the pursuit of its mission.

Naturally, one may ask: why should NATO be maintained and assisted as it pursues its new mission? The answer is easy: because it serves as a creator and protector of prosperity. It has done so during its first fifty years — just compare West Europe’s prosperity and security levels from 1945 to 1998 to those previously achieved — and it will be necessary in order to continue doing so in the future.

The necessity of the continuation of its new mission depends on two factors: (1) high economic interdependence between Europe (European Union – EU) and North America (North America Free Trade Agreement – NAFTA), and (2) globalization of economic activity. EU and NAFTA get richer not only from their economic interaction, but also from their interaction with the rest of the world. Thus, both factors contribute to EU’s and NAFTA’s increasing wealth levels and ever rising share of the global economic pie. Undeniably, it is not only a prosperity path that Europe and North America desire to continue following, but a path that they would like to share, under win/win conditions, with the rest of the world, especially Russia.

According to a UN report [2], out of the top 100 transnational corporations ranked by foreign assets in 1995, 78 originated from the EU/NAFTA regions, with the U.S. leading the per-country tally (30) followed by the U.K. (11), France (11) and Germany (9).

http://www.westga.edu/~bquest/1999/nato.html

News: El Chapo Declares War On ISIS: ISIS Rape Magazine: Forbidden News About Islamic Turkey

This Story was released by Tif Morgan, a tough little news reporter.

Lets get this rolling, The Border Security with Mexico, it will not take a back seat in and with the political num nuts in Congress. We will release forbidden news, that has costed memberships of may patriots within ning networks run by the  Political Officials of Government. Fancy that, Your own Government under AKA’s creating social networks in a attempt to control their CNN Fake News.

El Chapo, remember him, and his drug cartel, threaten Donald Trump.  A blood bath has spelled across Mexico, as US Government Funded ISIS Terrorist go to war against The Colombian Mexican Drug Cartel.  El Chapo noticed a movement to control, a conspiracy to have full operations over the Afghan Heroin growing in Mexico. CEO’s of Pharmaceutical Companies are now concerned the war will spell over into a major blob against the Federal Reserve’s Banking Agenda.

Orders were given by El Chapo, to his organization, and ISIS terrorist have been killed and dismembered, as a warning to ISIS and the US Government.

I will share this one story, because we are doing a follow up.

 

By Theodore Shoebat

El Chapo has declared war on ISIS after ISIS destroyed a number of his drug shipments that were coming through the Middle East. According to one report:

 

Mexican drug lord Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzman has a lot of enemies: the Mexican government, the Drug Enforcement Administration, Donald Trump.

But now the world’s most powerful drug trafficker is taking one what is arguably the world’s most feared organization, ISIS.

Chapo’s anger toward the radical jihadist group does not stem from some sense of altruism for the victims of the recent attacks in Paris or San Bernardino, but instead from concerns about his bottom line after ISIS destroyed several of his Sinaloa Cartel’s drug shipments moving through the Middle East.

In a harshly worded email to ISIS, which was leaked by the website Cartel Blog, Guzmán sent a stark warning to ISIS leader Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi about messing with the cartel’s business.

“You [ISIS] are not soldiers,” Guzmán purportedly wrote. “You are nothing but lowly p**. Your god cannot save you from the true terror that my men will levy at you if you continue to impact my operation.”

Guzmán added: “My men will destroy you. The world is not yours to dictate. I pity the next son of a whore that tries to interfere with the business of the Sinaloa Cartel. I will have their heart and tongue torn from them. It looks like it’s on.”

The Sinaloa Cartel is considered the world’s largest drug trafficking organization, with operations running throughout the Americas, Europe, Africa, Australia and Asia. In the Middle East, the cartel has become a major provider of cocaine, ecstasy and other so-called party drugs to oil-rich princes and businessmen throughout the region.

Islamic State fighters, however, abhor the use of drugs and have systemically been destroying any cartel shipments they get their hands on.

While the group is prolific on social media and in their video output, ISIS has so far not responded to the threats from Guzmán.

In his letter, Guzmán also hints that if he succeeds in destroying the terrorist group then he should be given immunity from prosecution. Guzmán made a highly-publicized escape earlier this year from a maximum security prison in Mexico, where he was awaiting trial on drug trafficking charges.

“It would be ironic that the group who ends up taking out ISIS is El Chapo’s drug cartel!” Guzmán reportedly wrote. “They seem up to the task and it could be worth giving immunity to this guy in exchange for him and his boys taking out ISIS once and for all!”

With this story about El Chapo I would like to post of the info that I have presented on the cartels.

ISIS has posted rape images so vulgar I will not be able to share them.

The concerns of to many cover ups,to the concerns that the blood bath, the rape, children going missing with out a trace, all of this has come to America, and they will not as of this moment, not build a Border Wall.

 

 ISIS Has a Rape Magazine On Line, but it was being Sold by Amazon.com, they have removed the Magazine.

Its the name involved, and connected Washington DC., New York, and in the UK.

1- Published:

	London, Pan Arab
Language:	Arabic
Established:	1946
Published:	daily
Website:	www.daralhayat.com

Al-Hayat, which means “Life”, is a leading pan-Arab daily newspapers. It is based in the UK, printed in London, Beirut, New York, and Riyadh, and is popular among Arab diaspora communities. Al-Hayat has a number of regional offices across the Middle East. Its main competitor is the other big pan-Arab newspaper published in London, Al-Sharq Al-Awsat.

Al-Hayat’s motto is a line taken from Egyptian poet Ahmed Shawki: “Life is belief and jihad”, meaning that expressing one’s opinions is as noble as spiritual struggle. The newspaper was founded in Beirut in 1946 but was forced to shut down in 1976, one year after the onset of the Lebanese civil war. It was refounded in 1988 and bought by the Saudi prince Khalid bin Sultan in 1990.

The newspaper is still widely read in Lebanon and many of its journalists and editors are Lebanese. Editorials are left-wing or liberal, and the paper often reflects an Arab nationalist view. The Saudi ownership means that the paper refrains from criticizing the Kingdom. In 2007, after a number of columns critical of the Saudi government, the paper’s distribution was halted for several days.

Al-Hayat is known for its influential and qualitative cultural section, and for providing a space for opinions ranging from religious and conservative voices to ultra-liberal and progressive writers. The late Edward Said was a frequent contributor.

http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/sources/alhayat

2- Aaron Y. Zelin : https://www.google.com/search?q=Aaron+Y.+Zelin&ie=utf-8&oe=…

3- Gerard Arthus : https://www.google.com/search?q=+Gerard+Arthus&ie=utf-8&oe=…

4- al-Hayat Media Centre / Al Hayat Media Center : https://www.google.com/search?q=al-Hayat+Media+Centre&ie=utf-8&…

Copies of Islamic State’s English-language propaganda magazine, Dabiq, have been pulled from the website of online retailer Amazon.

Four different volumes were available for sale on the site, but in a statement to the BBC, Amazon said the product had now been removed.

The author of the publications was listed as al-Hayat Media Centre, which is IS’s Western-focused media arm.

Islamic State is a proscribed terrorist organisation in the UK.

The magazines were being sold in paperback form on Amazon sites in the UK, US, France, Germany, Italy and Spain. It can be downloaded for free elsewhere.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-33035453

 

Median Empire Motorcycle Club Fights ISIS: Hot News

Members of a German motorcycle gang have arrived in the besieged Syrian City of Kobane to fight against Islamic State Militants (ISIS) who have been attacking the city for the past four weeks. And while their valor is noted, the UN German Parliament  has condemned their actions.

By John Hall for MailOnline and Chris Pleasance for MailOnline

Published: 16:01 EDT, 18 October 2014 | Updated: 16:02 EDT, 18 October 2014

Leaders of the Cologne-based Median Empire Motorcycle Club, which has strong Kurdish links, have posted images of their riders posing in the city – some of them carrying weapons.

The news comes just after three members of a notorious motorcycle gang from the Netherlands were told they had not committed any crime by travelling to Kobane to join the fight against ISIS.

Images of the Median Empire Motorcycle Club emerged on the group’s Facebook page, and showed the heavily tattooed riders with rifles slung over the shoulders.

In a shot of the Germans huddled together, the gang’s logo – a sinister looking white face on a black background – could clearly be seen on their leather vests.

The image was captioned: ‘Our boys were in Kobane today and told me today they were shot at but nothing happened. They are okay.’

Four days earlier, the same Facebook user wrote: ‘While others blabber and blabber, our boys are at the front fighting.’

The gang’s official Facebook page says the riders have travelled to the Middle East to distribute aid, and several images show them handing out food to Yazidis in what looks like a refugee camp.

Defence: A biker from the No Surrender gang in the Netherlands, identified only as Ron (right) poses alongside a Kurdish soldier in Syria after going to fight against ISIS

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2798507/now-german-biker-ga…

 ISIS has a war coming, between action ordered by the Trump Administration, Bikers Against ISIS, and News: El Chapo Declares War On ISIS: ISIS Rape Magazine: Forbidden …

 ISIS wanted a war they got one….

Breaking the News Story of The Century: Sussex Declaration

Breaking TTTG New Networking At Its Best, Tif Morgan at the Tea Party Command Center discovered a Document, hidden away in England, Internet News, seeing how the story is hot, I will share the all of it here. I will not edit the finding because I agree that the Clinton Family did hide the facts.

The Sussex Declaration of Independence Update is Important, For many Patriots here they have not had the chance to read;Unique Copy of Declaration of Independence Turns Up In London , here at the Tea Party Command Center. The British Empire is dragging their feet on the document. this is what little “O” me found out.

Robert R. Livingston was involved in this document, he went to England, the clue is this Sussex Declaration of Independence, Document is one of 2 different drafts. Of the same Declaration of Independence. The difference is,the Sussex Declaration this Document gave the Authority of The States to We The People, and not the States. According to original Documents The States are in Authority Over The United States Federal Government, thus, We The People Govern this Law of Of the Land.

The facts of this finding is clear, I hope the Pdf here can handle the doc. we will attempt to upload it. NOPE PDF will not up load…so here is the link: http://declaration.fas.harvard.edu/files/declaration/files/allen_an…

In the middle of the search for the truth two names turned up, connected to the, as I consider it, Sussex Declaration is the first draft and the dating is a attempt to hide the facts. Now the names, just two for now.

Robert R. Livingston case searched info: https://www.google.com/search?q=Robert+R.+Livingston+of+London+Engl…

George  Clinton London England:https://www.google.com/search?q=George++Clinton+London+England&…

George Clinton 1784 London England: https://www.google.com/search?q=George++Clinton+London+England&…

Clinton is a British surname, indicating one’s ancestors came from English places called Glympton or Glinton. Clinton has frequently been used as a given name since the late 19th century. Baron Clinton is a title of peerage in England, originally created in 1298.

Notable people with the name Clinton include:
Family of Bill and Hillary Clinton

Charles Clinton (1690–1773), French and Indian War colonel, father of James and George Clinton
James Clinton (1733–1812), American Revolutionary War general, father of DeWitt Clinton, brother of George Clinton
George Clinton (vice president) (1739–1812), first and third Governor of New York, fourth Vice President of the United States
DeWitt Clinton (1769–1828), seventh and ninth governor of New York, son of James and nephew of George Clinton
George Clinton Jr. (1771–1809), son of the vice president
George W. Clinton (1807–1885), American politician—Buffalo, New York, son of Governor DeWitt Clinton
Admiral George Clinton (Royal Navy officer) (1686–1761), British naval officer and colonial governor
General Henry Clinton (British Army officer, born 1730) (died 1795), British general during the American Revolutionary War
General William Henry Clinton (1769–1846), British general during the Napoleonic Wars
    Lieutenant General Henry Clinton (British Army officer, born 1771) (died 1829), British general during the Napoleonic Wars

Bill Clinton (born 1946), 42nd President of the United States
Hillary Clinton (born 1947), U.S. Secretary of State from 2009 to 2013, 2016 Democratic presidential nominee, and wife of Bill Clinton
Chelsea Clinton (born 1980), daughter of Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton

I just love the Anonymous Activity of the Elite of England, LOL Tif

Unique Copy of Declaration of Independence Turns Up In London

It has been suggested that The United States Declaration of Independence, was originally written in London England, the very first Document, draft, has stunned the world and this information is slowly make news in America.

Undated handout photo of a parchment manuscript of the US Declaration of Independence, believed to date from the 1780s and found in a records office in Chichester, southern England.

(West Sussex Record Office Add Mss 8981 \via AP)

by Danica Kirka Associated Press

 

A unique copy of the U.S. Declaration of Independence has been discovered in an unexpected place – England.

The copy, similar to the one viewed by millions each year at the National Archives in Washington has been locked away in a local records office in southeastern England forgotten by historians. Its significance wasn’t understood until recently, when Harvard researcher Emily Sneff stumbled on a mention in a catalog of the office’s holdings. Something tickled her curiosity: the copy was written on parchment.

And when Sneff and Harvard professor Danielle Allen saw the document, they were stunned.

“I thought, ‘Holy history, Batman!” Allen told The Associated Press on Monday. “We’d seen a lot of copies, but nothing like this.”

Sneff and Allen’s sleuthing led to a discovery that could shed new light on the founding document of the United States.

The team studied the document for two years and viewed it in person before sharing their conclusions with other historians last week.

The experts have dated what is now being called the “Sussex Declaration” to the 1780s — a time of political tumult before the Constitutional Convention, when the new nation was struggling to survive as a loose association of states governed by the Articles of Confederation.

The document is 24-inches-by-30 inches — the same size as the one housed at the National Archives. Also like the one at the archives, it is written by hand on parchment — the only two of their kind known to exist.

But there are also key differences. The names are not in the same order. For instance, John Hancock isn’t listed first or writ large, and the signatories aren’t grouped by state.

Historians believe the Sussex Declaration could have been owned by the Third Duke of Richmond, known as the “Radical Duke” because of his support for the American Revolution. The parchment came into the possession of a local lawyer who represented the family. It was deposited at the West Sussex Records Office in the 1950s.

But it remains unclear how the document got to Britain.

The researchers from the Declaration Resources Project plan to test the document this summer in an effort to clarify its provenance, and perform hyper-spectral imaging in hopes of deciphering text at the top of the parchment that appears to have been scraped off.

What is already clear is that the document was made during the tumultuous years after the American Revolution. Just after the signing of the declaration, copies were reproduced and distributed throughout the colonies and across the Atlantic to England. But the Sussex version was created a decade later and based on the original at the National Archives.

The Sussex Declaration is important because it underscores the arguments that divided the revolutionaries as they moved to establish a country. Historians have long debated whether there was continuity between the declaration and the Constitution or if it was a sharp break. The Sussex parchment suggests continuity. But it also has great import to the general public, Allen said.

One of the major debates of the time was whether the new nation would be based on the authority of the people or the authority of the states. The transcriber meticulously copied the declaration only to jumble the signatories as a political statement, giving weight to the people rather than the states, Allen said.

“This is really a symbolic way of saying we are all one people,” she said.

It goes to the essence of debates that continue in the U.S., as typified by the fact that Hillary Clinton won last year’s popular vote but Donald Trump became president because he won the Electoral College, which ensures the president is elected by a tally of states.

“This manuscript beautifully illuminates the nature of that puzzle,” Allen said.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-declaration-of-in…

Obamacare’s North American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) Scandal

Posted by Hank Jordan at the Tea Party Command Center.  May 3, 2017

Mr. Massingale went on line last night, a matter a fact all night long, 90% of our team is on line, and while searching Obamacare information, a Obama Presidential Scandal came into view. Paul Ryan’s buddy X- President Obama is a Pedophile. This is of course not listed as Fake News, but cold hard facts about the people involved in Obamacare.

A transcript from a 1997 speech shows Office of Safe Schools chief Kevin Jennings in the U.S. Department of Education expressed his admiration for Harry Hay, one of the nation’s first homosexual activists who launched the Mattachine Society in 1948, founded the Radical Faeries and was a longtime advocate for the North American Man-Boy Love Association, NAMBLA.

“One of the people that’s always inspired me is Harry Hay,” the transcript shows Jennings saying, “who started the first ongoing gay rights group in America. In 1948, he tried to get people to join the Mattachine Society. It took him two years to find one other person who would join.

“Well, [in] 1993,” Jennings continued, “Harry Hay marched with a million people in Washington, who thought he had a good idea 40 years before.”

WND has reported several times on Jennings’ homosexual activism, including his founding of the organization “Gay, Lesbian, Straight Education Network,” which advocates for homosexuality in public schools.

Most recently, he admitted that he now knows he should have reacted differently two decades ago when he was a teacher and he was approached by a 15-year-old student who admitted he had a sexual relationship with an older man.

“The Marketing of Evil: How Radicals, Elitists, and Pseudo-Experts …

Jennings’ response was to suggest using a condom, although the student’s statement probably revealed, at a minimum, statutory rape.

His perspectives and activities have come under scrutiny because of his office, where he now is responsible for creating and implementing programs that make public school classrooms across America “safe.”

The comments about Hay are significant because of Hay’s extreme positions regarding homosexuality.

For example, according to the website for the North American Man-Boy Love Association, Hay told the organization in a 1983 speech: “I also would like to say at this point that it seems to me that in the gay community the people who should be running interference for NAMBLA are the parents and friends of gays. Because if the parents and friends of gays are truly friends of gays, they would know from their gay kids that the relationship with an older man is precisely what thirteen-, fourteen-, and fifteen-year-old kids need more than anything else in the world. And they would be welcoming this, and welcoming the opportunity for young gay kids to have the kind of experience that they would need.”

The statements from Jennings are being reported by Americans for Truth, an activist organization that works to expose the actions and statements of the nation’s homosexual advocates.

It was just days earlier that a spokesman for President Barack Obam…

Americans for Truth chief Peter LaBarbera told WND the statements were transcribed from a tape of Jennings’ address before a “Looking to the Future” panel at GLSEN’s Mid-Atlantic conference Oct. 25, 1997, at Grace Church School in New York.

Jennings describes how “being finished” with his work might “some day mean that most straight people, when they would hear that someone was promoting homosexuality, would say, ‘Yeah, who cares?’”

“Close your eyes for a second and think, ‘What would the world look like if we were through with our work? If we were done. If we could close the doors on 27th street [GLSEN’s New York City headquarters], and shut down the chapters, and disband the board. What would be happening?’” he questioned.

“This is the only thing that can stop us, is if we believe that our dreams cannot come true,” he continued.

Then he praised Hay.

“Everybody thought Harry Hay was crazy in 1948, and they knew something about him which he apparently did not – they were right, he was crazy. You are all crazy. We are all crazy. All of us who are thinking this way are crazy, because you know what? Sane people keep the world the same [blank] old way it is now. It’s the people who think, ‘No, I can envision a day when straight people say, ‘So what if you’re promoting homosexuality?” Or straight kids say, ‘Hey, why don’t you and your boyfriend come over before you go to the prom and try on your tuxes on at my house?’”

He suggested conference participants “think how much can change in one lifetime if in Harry Hay’s one very short life, he saw change from not even one person willing to join him to a million people willing to travel to Washington to join him.”

A spokeswoman in Jennings’ division at the U.S. Department of Education declined to respond to WND’s request for comment today. A spokesman at the federal agency’s office of public information said he would have to check before responding. No subsequent call or e-mail was received.

Besides Hay’s endorsement of a “relationship” between teens and adult homosexuals, in 1994 he gave another NAMBLA address that cited the “growth and change” in the previous years.

“By far, gays’ and lesbians’ greatest strides were in the dimensions of gay consciousness and in our breathtaking discoveries in the richness and diversity of gay spirit. It is in the realm of gay spirit where all the groups comprising the gay and lesbian community currently are being challenged to take great leaps, to expand their self-visions and potential horizons,” he said. “In this period, my beloved Radical Faeries moved to perceive that our lovely and beautiful sexuality is the gateway to spirit. Perhaps NAMBLA might consider expanding its parameters also.”

According to the archives of Concerned Women for America, when Hay died in 2002, no mainstream media outlets reported his advocacy for the pedophile activities of NAMBLA.

Hay also urged that NAMBLA, which advocates for the elimination of any “age of consent” restrictions, be considered mainstream in America.

“NAMBLA’s record as a responsible gay organization is well known. NAMBLA was spawned by the gay community and has been in every major gay and lesbian march. … NAMBLA’s call for the abolition of age of consent is not the issue. NAMBLA is a bona fide participant in the gay and lesbian movement. NAMBLA deserves strong support in its rights of free speech and association and its members’ protection from discrimination and bashing,” he said.

According to the Americans for Truth website, the incident involving the 15-year-old was just one among a series of egregious behaviors by Jennings.

Another was the “fistgate” scandal in which his organization led discussions at a seminar where “young teens were guided on how to perform dangerous homosexual perversions, including ‘fisting,’” the website said.

Yet another was Jennings’ address in a New York City church on March 20, 2000.

He said: “Twenty percent of people are hard-core fair-minded [pro-homosexual] people. Twenty percent are hard-core [anti-homosexual] bigots. We need to ignore the hard-core bigots, get more of the hard-core fair-minded people to speak up, and we’ll pull that 60 percent [of people in the middle] over to our side. That’s really what I think our strategy has to be. We have to quit being afraid of the religious right. We also have to quit — I’m trying to find a way to say this. I’m trying not to say, ‘[F—] ’em!’ which is what I want to say, because I don’t care what they think! [audience laughter] Drop dead!”

Jennings is among a number of Obama “czars” who have become controversial, including Van Jones, the ex–Green Jobs Czar who quit in the middle of the night after being found to have called Republicans an obscenity and being linked to the idea that the U.S. government was behind or at least allowed 9/11.

Harvard professor Cass Sunstein, confirmed by the Senate as the administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs at the Office of Budget and Management, was exposed for his belief that animals should be given legal rights like humans.

Technically, Jennings is not one of Obama’s “czars,” who are special advisers accountable to no one but the president. Jennings was named to a post in the Department of Education. However, his hiring did not require legislative oversight, such as the Senate vetting process required for other appointees.

WND previously reported on a speech Jennings gave in 1995 outlining his manipulation of words to obtain his aims.

Excerpts have been posted on the website of MassResistance, where chief Brian Camenker has worked to oppose the demands of homosexual activists.

In the speech, Jennings described how he was concerned about being described as promoting homosexuality, so he chose to campaign on the idea of “safety” instead.

“If the radical right can succeed in portraying us as preying on children, we will lose. Their language – ‘promoting homosexuality’ is one example – is laced with subtle and not-so-subtle innuendo that we are ‘after their kids,’” he told the conference.

He continued, “In Massachusetts the effective reframing of this issue was the key to the success of the Governor’s Commission on Gay and Lesbian Youth. We immediately seized upon the opponent’s calling card – safety – and explained how homophobia represents a threat to students’ safety by creating a climate where violence, name-calling, health problems, and suicide are common. Titling our report ‘Making Schools Safe for Gay and Lesbian Youth,’ we automatically threw our opponents onto the defensive and stole their best line of attack. This framing short-circuited their arguments and left them back-pedaling from day one.”

WND reported earlier when it became known Jennings was appointed.

Jennings also wrote the foreword for a book called “Queering Elementary Education: Advancing the Dialogue about Sexualities and Schooling.”

http://www.wnd.com/2009/10/111792/

 As Paul Ryan stands next to his Homosexual Pedophile Man-Boy Lover, promoting one of the largest scams in American History the Healthcare Bill. Which is is by the way nothing more then a Pharmaceutical Investment Opportunity, so that Tax Cuts for the Rich Investors of Obamacare get a break. The whole system is falling apart. Pharmaceutical Companies are making Billions, and still the system is taxing Americans around $200 Billion per year.

 These are the numbers…

In early March, GOP leaders Kevin Brady and Paul Ryan unleashed their plan to repeal and replace Obamacare, publishing proposed legislation in the form of the American Health Care Act. Last week, the Congressional Budget Office released its score of the plan, and two of the primary criticisms that emerged from the report were as follows:

The plan results in an $880 billion tax cut over the next decade, with at least $274 billion of the cuts going directly into the pockets of the richest 2%, and
Medicaid would be cut by an equivalent $880 billion over the next decade, making it more difficult for low-income taxpayers to procure insurance.

WASHINGTON, DC – MARCH 21: House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) speaks to the media after after a House Republican closed party conference attended by U.S. President Donald Trump, on Capitol Hill, on March 21, 2017 in Washington, DC. President Trump urged House Republicans to support his American Health Care Act. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

Yesterday, the GOP released amendments to its health care bill, and in response to the shortcomings highlighted by the CBO report, the changes to the bill would add more tax breaks for the rich and further slash Medicaid funding.

Yup, you read that right. But as counterintuitive as it may seem, there is a method to the GOP’s madness, as yesterday’s changes 1) make it more likely the bill will pass the House and potentially, the Senate, and 2) it brings within reach the bigger prize being sought by Republican leaders: tax reform.

American Health Care Act: Original Version

A full discussion of th original bill designed to repeal and replace Obamacare can be found here, but in this piece I’ll cut to the headlines.
Recommended by Forbes

The plan would repeal nearly all of the taxes created under Obamacare, including the following:

The individual mandate would disappear retroactive to 1/1/2016. Thus, individuals would no longer be penalized for failing to obtain coverage.
The employer mandate would disappear retroactive to 1/1/2016, meaning employers with more than 50 employees would no longer be penalized for failing to cover those employees.
The net investment income tax and additional Medicare tax, which were used in part to fund the tax credits used to subsidize insurance premiums of low-income taxpayers, would be removed effective 1/1/2018. More on this later.
The premium tax credit would remain in limited form until 2020, but would not be available for any plan that covers abortion.

In place of the premium tax credit, the American Health Care Act would enact a new credit that would focus less on income levels and more on age, ranging from $2,000 for those under 30 to $4,000 to those over 60, with phase-outs beginning at $150,000 of taxable income (if married, $75,000 if single).

The new law also makes the following changes to the insurance industry:

The federal matching rate for adults made eligible for Medicaid by Obamacare would be reduced to equal the rate for other enrollees in the state beginning in 2020.
The bill appropriates funding for grants to states beginning in 2018.
It removes the requirement, beginning in 2020, that insurers who offer nongroup plans cover at least 60% of the cost of covered benefits.
It requires insurance companies to charge an extra 30% for premiums if the applicant has not been covered for a period of 63 days in the previous year.
Allows insurers to charge elderly applicants five times what it charges younger applicants (current law provides a cap of three times the premiums for younger taxpayers).

CBO Response

The Congressional Budget Office was tasked with scoring the plan, and the results weren’t pretty. The CBO found that by eliminating the taxes discussed above, the plan provided an $880 billion tax cut. And because the net investment income tax and additional Medicare tax, by definition, are only imposed on the wealthiest 2% of taxpayers, those taxpayers would stand to save $274 billion over the next ten years. In addition, the plan would cut Medicaid spending by $880 billion, and most importantly, leave 24 million more taxpayers uninsured by 2025 compared to the projected uninsured under Obamacare.

As you might imagine, the threat of 25 million people voters losing insurance over the next decade spooked some Republicans that would have otherwise been itching to tear down Obamacare. And since the GOP will need 51 votes in the Senate to pass the bill — and Republicans own only 52 seats — they will need complete party buy-in to get the bill done. After the CBO’s score was released, the rhetoric coming out of the Senate was that enough Republicans had jumped ship to put the bill’s passage at significant risk.

Amendments to the Bill

Due to it’s lukewarm reception, amendments were made to the American Health Care Act last night. And in the face of the CBO’s depressing report, the most significant change made by the GOP was to….wait for it….accelerate the tax cuts for the richest 2%.

That’s right…the response to the unfavorable CBO scoring was to repeal the net investment income tax — which assesses an additional 3.8% surtax on items like interest, dividends, rents and royalties of taxpayers earning more than $250,000 (if married, $200,000 if single) — and the 0.9% Medicare tax — which assesses an additional surcharge on earned income in excess of those same thresholds — retroactive to January 1, 2017, rather than wait for 2018 as the original bill proposed.

If you find yourself confused as to why the GOP would answer a negative CBO report by adding an additional $85 billion tax cut for the rich by moving the repeal date of the net investment income tax and additional Medicare tax forward one year, then you’ll really be scrambling to understand that one of the other major amendments to the bill further cuts Medicaid by, in part, allowing states to add a work requirement.

The official reason given for accelerating the tax breaks was to stimulate the economy. Because the net investment income tax is imposed on most sales of stock and business interests, GOP leadership suggested that repealing the taxes effective to January 1st of this year would incentivize taxpayers to sell their assets in 2017, rather than wait until 2018 when the repeal of the net investment income tax would save them 3.8%.

That argument rings a bit hollow, however. If the GOP were concerned solely with motivating taxpayers to sell their assets in 2017, the bill could have simply made the repeal of the two taxes effective on the date it is signed into law. After all, three months of 2017 are already done and dusted; it’s not like taxpayers can retroactively change their behavior and start selling stocks for January through March.

As a result, there has to be another reason the GOP saw fit to add an additional $85 billion tax break in the latest amendments to the health care bill. And in fact, there are three:

First, by accelerating tax breaks for the rich and further limiting Medicaid funding, the GOP hopes to make the bill more attractive to far-right conservatives who love the former and loathe the latter. If such moves swing even one Republican Senator who may have believed the original bill to be too liberal, $85 billion in lost tax revenue and some negative publicity will be a small price to pay if it means the bill may ultimately receive the required votes in the Senate.

Second, the additional tax breaks could have simply been placed into the bill as negotiating leverage. For example, if the bill moves to the Senate, the Senate could once again push back repeal of the net investment income tax and additional Medicare tax until 2018, and then use that additional $85 billion in tax revenue to pay for insurance premium subsidies for the poor or elderly. This may engender more support for the bill from moderate Republicans in the Senate.

And finally, and perhaps most importantly to GOP leadership, if the tax breaks are in fact here to stay, to the extent those larger tax breaks can be contained within the health care legislation, the more likely significant tax reform will be possible later in the year. Why?

The GOP would prefer to use the reconciliation process to push through tax reform, just as they intend to do with the health care bill. The reconciliation process is advantageous because it requires a simple majority of 51 Republican votes in the Senate, rather than the 60 votes normally necessary.

To use the reconciliation process, however, the bill cannot add to the deficit beyond a 10-year window, the so-called, “Byrd Rule.”

By accelerating the tax breaks in the health care bill, it increases the total lost tax revenue as part of that bill to nearly $1 trillion. This, in turn, reduces the baseline against which a subsequent tax reform bill will be measured by $1 trillion. And $1 trillion pays for a lot of tax breaks: up to a 10% reduction in the corporate tax rate, for example. In effect, because $1 trillion in tax cuts would be shifted to the health care bill, it gives the GOP $1 trillion in free tax breaks as part of the tax reform bill before running afoul of the Byrd rule.

To illustrate, assume that the projected 10-year deficit from 2017-2026 was $5 trillion (it is not) BEFORE the health care bill was passed. The health care bill, in total, is more-or-less deficit neutral, meaning that even WITH the $1 trillion in tax cuts, because of the changes to Medicaid spending and the premium tax credits, it won’t add to the $5 trillion projected deficit.

Next, when the GOP takes on tax reform, it will be tasked with again not adding to that deficit, but with $1 trillion in tax cuts having already been achieved through the healthcare bill. That’s not a bad start, particularly when the GOP is hoping to further slash individual and corporate tax rates while eliminating the estate tax.

Whatever their reasons for accelerating the tax breaks in the healthcare bill, as you might imagine, the amendments have done nothing to solve the inequities perceived the first time around with the original legislation. Earlier today, the Tax Policy Center issued a report containing some damning findings about the revised American Health Care Act’s progressivity. Specifically, the TPC determined that under the amended bill:

The average family with less than $10,000 of income in 2022 would be $1,420 worse off, a net reduction of more than 30% of the family’s income. While these families would experience a $210 tax cut — largely owing to the repeal of the individual mandate — the changes to Medicaid and the premium tax credit would cost them $1,630.
The average family with more than $200,000 of income in 2022, however, would be $5,640 better off, a net increase of 1.1% of the family’s income. These families would lose $40 in Medicaid funding and tax credits, but would benefit from the tax breaks — primarily the repeal of the net investment income tax and additional Medicare tax — to the tune of $5,680.
In total, 70.6% of the $1 trillion in tax cuts contained within the bill would fall to the richest 2%, those making more than $200,000 annually.
In total, 75% of the lost federal tax credits would impact families with income of less than $30,000.

In fairness, one of the amendments to the bill would allocate an additional $75 billion to be used to subsidize the insurance premiums of adults aged 50-64 — who were hardest hit by the original version of the bill — but those subsidies have yet to be formalized. Instead, the House has charged the Senate with devising the structure of the additional credits.

Tax breaks for the rich and lost credits for the poor may make for splashy headlines, but they do little to deter the passage of a bill; in fact, in this case they may actually expedite it. If the same Republicans who ridiculed the original American Health Care Act as “Obamacare-lite” jump on board with the new amendments, it may be enough to get the bill passed. And at the end of the day, that appears to be all that really matters to those who authored it.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/anthonynitti/2017/03/22/in-amended-hea…

 George Soros Investments into Obamacare: https://www.google.com/search?q=George+Soros+Investments+into+Obama…

Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) Member George Soros contributed $2 million to the North American Man Boy Love Association. They are actively advocating for sex with children. Their byline is “Sex before eight or it is too late”. Please tell me how a seven year old can consent to having sex with an adult?

http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2016/06/06/the-eu-is-finding-a-wa…

Frank Hester Founder Of Trans-Pacific Partnership & Obamacare Tax

Hank Jordan a member of the Tea Party Command Center, he is also a member of the TTTG Network News Team. I will share the information, as it is, and link you back to the story.

By Hank Jordan

After reviewing thousands of pages, I felt lost, of how to prove Obamacare is a Tax By the IRS of London England. Mrs. Alice Trinity Littlefoot saved the day. You all do remember her. She was more then just a member of a Tea Party, she is a X- IRS Officer, and like I said, she saved the day. Not only did she show me a financial transfer of funds from this Government of the good old USA, it went to a company owned by London England.

Trans-Pacific Partnership & Obamacare goes hand in hand, not only is this system costing Americans over $200 Billion per year in a IRS Tax Scandal, this Government made Laws where this can not even be challenged in the Courts. They Took the Constitution Of The United States, used pre- prepared Laws and wrapped this up so tight that it is all most impossible to break. But it can be exposed. The following has been seen by many patriots, both Republican and Democrats. What you do not know is Paul Ryan is deeply involved in this, we have a PDF doc, of TPP and Obamacare, Congressional Records, Paul Ryan’s name was the first on the page. He was one of the main Congressional Leaders for this IRS Obamacare Tax of London England.

Like I stated most here have seen this before-

Frank Hester

TPP’s Founder & CEO to be given an OBE
Frank Hester: http://www.tpp-uk.com/latest-news-stories/tpps-founder-ceo-to-be-gi…

The Cabinet Office announced today that TPP’s Founder & CEO, Frank Hester, has been named on the Queen’s New Year’s Honours List. The list, which recognises the service and achievements of ordinary people across the UK, is announced every year just before New Year’s Eve. Early in 2015, Frank will be awarded with an OBE (Order of the British Empire), for his services to healthcare. Awards are usually presented by a member of the Royal Family at a formal ceremony.

  January 5, 2015-  http://www.tpp-uk.com/

Obamacare and TPP Legislation Goes Hand In Hand

November 11, 2016 • Posted by Big Molecule Watch

Legislation Tracker

While Donald Trump’s victory has made world headlines, what may be less well known to our readers is that the election also gave Trump’s Republican Party majority control of both the House and the Senate.  For the first time in many years, Republicans will control both the White House and Congress.  This will make it easier for Trump to achieve his legislative goals.  During his campaign, Trump made clear that these goals included repealing and replacing the Affordable Care Act (also known as “Obamacare”), of which the BPCIA is a part, and withdrawing from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade agreement.

Following up on our promise to keep a close watch on legislative developments affecting the BPCIA and TPP, we note today’s article in the New York Times, which reports that Congressional Republicans announced yesterday that they would “move quickly next year” to repeal the ACA.  While not giving any specifics, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said that repealing the ACA is “pretty high on our agenda,” and that he “would be shocked if we didn’t move forward and keep our commitment to the American people.”

Moreover, while TPP is on the table for now, Mr. McConnell dashed any remaining hopes for speedy ratification, stating that it’s certainly not going to be brought up this year,” before Trump takes office.

While it is far too early to predict whether or how the BPCIA or TPP may be affected by November 8th’s electoral earthquake, it appears that both Obamacare and TPP will be in the crosshairs of the Republican-led executive and legislative branches next year.

Stay tuned for further legislative developments at Big Molecule Watch.

http://www.bigmoleculewatch.com/2016/11/11/update-obamacare-and-tpp/

For the last several years, the US government has been negotiating a free-trade agreement known as the  (TPP) with 11 other countries across the Asia-Pacific and Latin American regions, which could have major impact on the pharmaceutical market.  When finalized it will be the largest free-trade agreement in history, impacting up to one-third of world trade and roughly 40 percent of the global gross domesticproduct. The deal has attracted a fair share of  from a wide range of , including concerns over proposed regulations for biologic drugs in participating countries. Specifically, critics are concerned about the length of data exclusivity granted to the companies that hold the patents on these drugs. Below is a primer on biologics and how they are being addressed in the TPP.

---

What are biologics and biosimilars?

Biologic drugs include any therapy derived from a biological source; a group which includes vaccines, anti-toxins, proteins, and monoclonal antibodies. Because they are typically much larger and more structurally complex than traditional ‘small-molecule’ drugs, they are also more difficult—and much more costly—to develop and manufacture. Biologics are also among the most expensive drugs on the market, costing an average of 22 times more than nonbiologic drugs. Avastin, a cancer drug, can cost more than $50,000 a year, while the rheumatoid arthritis drug Remicade can cost up to $2,500 per injection.

Given these high costs, there is substantial interest in encouraging the development of biosimilars, a term used to describe follow-on versions of an original biologic. Estimates of the potential cost savings vary substantially, but some have predicted that competition from biosimilars could reduce US spending on biologics by $44 to $66 billion over the next ten years.  In the European Union, biosimilars have been on the market since 2006, and a 2013 analysis found that, for the 14 biosimilars on the market, the average price discount was about 25 percent. By 2020, the overall cost savings are projected to total $16-$43 billion.

After the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was passed in 2010, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) developed an accelerated approval pathway for biosimilars, modeled after the pathway used for the approval of small-molecule generics. In order to meet the criteria for biosimilarity, the drug must share the same mechanism of action for the approved condition of use, and there must be no clinically significant differences between the two drugs in terms of purity, safety, or potency. FDA recently approved its first biosimilar, , which is a copy of the oncology drug Neupogen.

https://www.brookings.edu/blog/health360/2015/05/19/health-policy-101-how-the-trans-pacific-partnership-will-impact-prescription-drugs/

In a data search for funds between the US Government and the IRS of London England, the case search for the Healthcare Bill HR 3200 IRS London England came up with this: https://www.google.com/search?q=Healthcare+Reform+Bill+Act+Section+1233+of+HR+3200+London+England&spell=1&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiStJjZrdLTAhXKhVQKHexEAjwQvwUIIygA#q=HR+3200+IRS+London+England

To tell you the truth, this has been submitted to our team, because of the impact of the total funds involved and transferred. At the same time Healthcare cost at around $200 Billion Tax Dollars, automatically removed from the federal system. Then they turn right around and want more money for a healthcare reform thats failing.

And dont worry this was found in a public domain, but it is unclear who exposed the funds and the money exchange between companies of the UK and this federal gov. The link is below, review the information for yourself.

SEC-DOCUMENT-0000898417-12-000055.txt : 20120816
SEC-HEADER- 0000898417-12-000055.hdr.sgml : 20120816
ACCEPTANCE-DATETIME- 20120816165523
ACCESSION NUMBER:        0000898417-12-000055
CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE:    13F-HR/A
PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT:        1
CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT:    20120630
FILED AS OF DATE:        20120816
DATE AS OF CHANGE:        20120816
EFFECTIVENESS DATE:        20120816

FILER:

COMPANY DATA:    
COMPANY CONFORMED NAME:            PRUDENTIAL PLC
CENTRAL INDEX KEY:            0000898419
IRS NUMBER:                000000000

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/898419/000089841712000055/0...
 original source:  http://teapartyorg.ning.com/forum/topics/frank-hester-founder-of-trans-pacific-partnership-obamacare-tax?xg_source=activity 

Dear President Donald Trump Help A Mother To Understand

I really have no choice, but to share this, Tif Morgan at the Tea Party Command Center, brought the site to a stand still, with her political hopes. Even though she is very upset, and slammed Donald Trump and Congress, there is nothing they can say, because she is right.

 

• Posted by Tif Morgan on May 2, 2017 at 12:19pm in Trump Administration

I find it very hard to believe, that the basic forum for Congress to vote a Budget Agreement, so that the Government Employees can collect their pay checks. So the new forum is to hold America Hostage, and place Border Security with Mexico, in the trash can.

I do remember President Trump, how you brought in the rape of a elderly lady, by a illegal criminal. And thats what the man was, a animal. I am personally going to ask for help in gathering information of Crimes Against Women, Rape, the target is the listing of all the crimes committed by criminals from other countries. Until the very seat where you park your back side vibrates.

On YouTube, countless crimes, one of which is dealing with a 14 year old child, gang raped by illegals.

read more: http://teapartyorg.ning.com/forum/topics/dear-president-donald-trump-help-a-mother-to-understand?xg_source=activity

Also see this,

Donld Trump’s Healthcare Reform Bill Section 1233 of HR 3200 Is Ridiculous

Paul Ryan & Obama All Nice & Chummy

The (FCC) Federal Communications Commission Involved Approving Web Sites

Is There A UN Agenda, by the British Empire Against Trump, Against America- Part 1

Is There A UN Agenda, by the British Empire Against Trump, Against America- Part 2

Is There A UN Agenda, by the British Empire Against Trump, Against America- Part 3

Is There A UN Agenda, by the British Empire Against Trump, Against America- Part 4

America Is Under Attack By These 187 Groups Funded By George Soros

TED Talks: Scientist Blows Whistle On Chemtrails At Ted Conference

I will be bringing the blogs here, I have a feeling that the Tea Party Command Center is coming to a end.